原帖由 zhaojianzhi 于 2007-8-11 21:31 发表 ![]()
王小二,事到如今,看来你还没搞清楚,你有没有认真看我给你的验货报告?上面功率没测,高压没打是因为工厂没有测试设备,这是出在备注里面的.凭什么说给你的参考报告没有价值?
摘原报告如下:
备注部分:The manufacturer could not provide facilities to perform Hi-voltage check, Power consumption check & Radio frequency rate check; actual found the test result for function of radio was OK.
DATA MEASUREMENT部分:
Hi voltage check (at 4300V, 50Hz) ( 32 Samples): Not conform, refer to remark 4
Radio frequency rate check ( 32 Samples): Not conform, refer to remark 4
Function Check ( 32 Samples): Conform
Internal Check ( 6 Samples): Conform
Transportation Drop Test ( 1 Carton ): Conform
Power on check for 4 hours ( 6 Samples): Conform
Rub and tape test on logo ( 2 Samples): Conform
Battery Compartment Fitness Check ( 32 Samples): Conform
(by using the brand name and type of battery):Jiuyang battery R03c/sum-4 1.5v AAA
Power consumption check at 220V, 50Hz ( 32 Samples): Not conform, refer to remark 4
Distance of remote control ( 5 Samples): Conform ; Actual found : about 7m
其他箱规的测试,我就不写在这里了.
CDF部分:
7) CRITICAL COMPONENT CHECK:
Component description Actual marking on component Does the Marking comply with certificate?
Item:
1. plug Guanghui ccc 6a 250v~ nil
2. Power cord KEMA KEUR VDE h03wh2-f 2*0.75mm2 nil
3. Decode board 1283axih nil
4. Decoder Yk08a nil
5. Radio board Jsb-988b nil
6. speaker Hw 8o5w nil
7. transformer nil nil
*Note: “Nil” --No any certificate was provided by factory
我不明白,按照这样操作列出CDF,是要求太严了吗?拍CDF的照片过分吗?
转自:外贸验货员网 http://bbs.wtoqc.net/index.php?fromuid=2115
...
叹气
就事论事的说,兄台你这份参考报告也非常不专业,现在没空,晚上到酒店慢慢给你挑毛病 |