|
一个链接:
2008
New PAK document
zek_01_1-08_pak_verbindlich.pdf
(161.81 KB, 下载次数: 0)
|
25.06.2008
|
The document of ZEK 01,1-08 replaces the document of ZEK 01-08 with publication date.
Substantial contents of the past document were not changed (e.g. requirements of products, the testing method, PAK maximum values etc. which can be kept).
Changes of editorial kind were essentially made as well as on the homepage of the ZLS in connection with the document of ZEK 01-08 valid publications and/or clarifications were considered.
The following changes were in detail made:
[table] |
| With the term ?“now expressly ?technical media and consumer products “are meant product.
|
| Clearer structure
The structure of the PAK document was restructured. A procedure is to be kept, which plans an endangerment evaluation as the first step. Subsequently, takes place the categorization, which was called in the past document as the first and from there to misunderstandings led. To be evaluated in the last step the examination (EN) to be made and their results are.
Additionally supplementing references to the endangerment evaluation and categorization of a product/a product group by the exchange of experience circle as well as to the use from already available test reports were taken up.
|
| The temporary agreements to existing and new certificates, specified on the homepage, were integrated. In particular a temporary agreement was considered, which refers to certificates, whose monitoring rotation amounts to two years.
|
| The testing method was supplemented around contributions, which describe the procedure for matrix problems.
|
| From the table in category 1 the purchase too ?materials, in contact with food stand “, due to more exact regulations in the LFGB painted. In all other respects the reference takes place that parts (surface, construction units, building groups, materials etc.) of the product are excluded from the application of the PAK document, if resembles and/or large legal regulations exist to PAK in products.
|
The available, testing method which can be accomplished uncomplicatedly is ensured the result of extensive interlaboratory tests and thereby uniform inspection results as well as the comparability of inspection results of different laboratories. Alternative testing methods are not at present intended from there.
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Important information for the conversion of the PAK document ZEK 01-08
in connection with other legislation, in particular food rightImportant information for the application OF the PAH document ZEK 01-08 issued by the cent ral Experience Exchange Committee (ZEK) in connec tion with more other legally requirements, in particular food law
[/td][td]
08.05.2008
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
In the PAK document ZEK 01-08 in table 1, category 1 on materials, which are located in contact with food, purchase is taken.
In particular for these materials there are large speciallegal regulations (e.g. consumer article, food and animal feed law book (food and animal feed law book - LFGB)). If materials are subject to other legislation, then these are valid in place of the regulations, which are made in the PAK document.
Here it is to be noted that the exception is valid only for the individual material, the construction unit and/or the building group and not for the entire product. Materials and parts of the product, which are not seized by the other legislation, are to be evaluated in the context of the gs indication awarding procedure according to the defaults of the PAK document.
Example: water-prominent parts in coffee machines, those in contact with food (e.g. ) Stand for water, etc., are subject for the other legislation LFGB and are thus exceptional from the application of the PAK document. Grasp surfaces of the coffee machine must be evaluated however further according to the requirements of the PAK document.
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Question for the application of the PAK resolution during new exhibition of an existing gs indication certificateQuestion referring ton the application OF the PAH Decision into case OF rice south OF A gs Mark of Certificate
[/td][td]
05.05.2008
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Is the examination of a product for that a valid gs indication certificate already exists in accordance with the requirements of the PAK resolution immediately and always necessarily, if the gs indication certificate is again issued?
The following approach was specified:
An immediate consideration is not immediately necessary during the new exhibition of a gs indication certificate already existing in the following reasons:
In the case of change of the company name usually new gs indication certificates are issued. Since the product does not change however constructionally as well as concerning other characteristics and it more or less concerns during the new exhibition of the gs indication certificate a pure formality, a consideration of the requirements of the PAK resolution is only necessary during the production plant monitoring which can be accomplished.
(Consider: By the new exhibition of the gs indication certificate the periods for the execution of the control measures for the production of the product, already specified, do not change.)
Same is valid in similar way with the removal of the gs indication certificate owner, if the product does not change concerning all characteristics and is necessary no additional examination in terms of safety of the product.
For range of the secondary certificates (OEM certificates) the v. G. procedure can be likewise used. In these cases an examination is in accordance with the defaults of the PAK document at the latest up to the next control measure for the production of the product in accordance with the periods ?of the main certificate already specified “and/or up to 31. To accomplish March 2009 compellingly. Over it going out monitoring intervals are not permissible in these cases.
Regarding the OEM certificates and thus also for ?the main certificates “the PAK document - as fixed - to at the latest 31 must. March 2009 to be used.
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Important information for the conversion of the PAK document ZEK 01-08[/td][td]
20.03.2008
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Due to complaints PAK document above mentioned over different approaches with application we refer to the following:
The document can cause due to its structure to a misinterpretation and thus a biased error in application.
Fundamental first a risk analysis is to be accomplished and documented appropriately by the certified places. On the basis the result is to be made then for the relevant (seizing) surfaces in accordance with categorization the document.
According to categorization proofs are to be furnished and/or accomplished examinations. The entire procedure is to be documented in the context of the gs indication awarding procedure.
In order to emphasize above mentioned procedure more clearly, an editorial change of the ZEK document 01-08 is intended as follows and immediately applicable:
In order to ensure a uniform and appropriate procedure during the gs indication awarding, all freely accessible surfaces should not generally be examined. Intention of the document is it that actually only relevant (seizing) surfaces are regarded. It is not goal-leading, ?to security “all product parts or - surfaces of examining.
For the relief of the definition, which (seizing) must be regarded surfaces, the exchange of experience circles are to compile a common approach/categorization (product group specific).
Still if no approach/categorization is certain, or concerns it a special case for a product/a product group, then is to be proceeded on the basis a risk analysis.
[/td][/tr][tr][td]
Application of the PAK requirements ZEK 01-08 |
|