标题: 为何有年龄组标识还是被认为违反法规？ [打印本页] 作者: dotzuv 时间: 2011-10-22 20:44 标题: 为何有年龄组标识还是被认为违反法规？ 产品玩具包装有“Not suitable for children under three years” 和“不适于三岁以下”图标，但产品还是以以下理由被勒令回收。
Choking
The product poses a risk of choking for children under 36 months because the plastic ring around the cat's neck may easily be detached and the ring fits completely into the small parts cylinder.
The product does not comply with the Toys Directive and the relevant European standard EN 71.
参考信息 <CPSC年龄判断指南(中文)> 相关联接如下，由网友yoyoly提供，谢谢 http://www.cpsc.gov/BUSINFO/adgchinese.pdf作者: dotzuv 时间: 2011-10-22 20:54
如果是做包装时做的年龄标识，是不行的，不是你想写几岁就写几岁的。
至少要在公证行的评估下才能确定它的适合年龄。
出这种问题的关键在于年龄评估不谨慎。作者: dotzuv 时间: 2011-10-22 20:54
引用原标准EN71的注解：
A.34 Warning for toys not intended for children under 36 months (see 7.2)
The requirement that toys which due to their characteristics are generally considered as intended for children
under 36 months shall not contain small parts, should be observed strictly. The warning does not release the
manufacturer or his authorized representative from his obligation to meet this requirement.The use of warnings should not be confused with the recommendation for use. Unnecessary warnings should
be avoided as they reduce the effectiveness of such statements.