前提是你自己要理直气壮。。。。作者: diegolee 时间: 2011-5-9 14:52 标题: 回复 6# huyuxiao 的帖子 我是没有根据AQL来抽检,由于数量只有300多把,我是全检的,当时并没有发现问题。国外老板也没说出现问题的数量是多少作者: diegolee 时间: 2011-5-9 14:53
我只想请教一下,是什么原因造成的这些问题作者: zhwebi 时间: 2011-5-27 15:04 标题: 一看图片就知道皮质差 运到那儿的?皮质差,单层皮,遇温度高就收缩,再加上抗拉性差,就易破了。。作者: henrytedd 时间: 2011-8-5 22:06
Your company didn't setup QC procedures to control product from raw material.That's why your company didn't require any LAB testing process when your got preproduction sample.
Whatever real leather,PU,PVC,bonded,we shall be do below testing for guarantee the quality of raw material.
1.WET AND DRY RUB TESTING 2. TENSILE TESTING 3.STATIC PRESSURE TESTING.
These testing need testing machines.Even lots of all companies can't offer these machine.We also need to ask 3th part serve for these testing servises. As an inspector job,I think you just can inspect workmanship, packing and do some on site testing for the bulk. Inspector can't have capability to
solve these testing issue at all.The solution is you should be asking your boss setup the LAB testing process.
I think you just an inspector no QC manager,so you can't take responsibility for this mistake.
But your boss have to lost money and you win this experiences.作者: walter82 时间: 2011-8-6 10:04
同意9樓觀點,省成本也不能這樣省,作者: crh1314520 时间: 2011-9-12 18:15
同意各级领导意见作者: mond58647604 时间: 2011-9-16 16:48
PU是这种人造材料一定不能长时间高温下储存
再有就是pu越薄就会越便宜,越薄越容易破裂,还要查看PU的底料作者: 大使 时间: 2011-10-26 15:02
I agree with up、、、、、作者: 大使 时间: 2011-10-26 15:03
I AGREE WITH UPER作者: cpsha 时间: 2011-10-26 15:32
老外说的对作者: kkio 时间: 2011-10-28 17:32
expert reply~~~fantastic good
but i do think so many of buying office do not have the facility what your suggestion