验货员论坛

标题: 外观缺陷,如何判断其问题的严重性 [打印本页]

作者: joanallen    时间: 2008-4-21 16:26
标题: 外观缺陷,如何判断其问题的严重性
外观缺陷,如何判断其问题的严重性?比如,一个产品表面的划伤问题,什么程度判定为次要问题,什么程度要判定为重要问题?各位大侠,可有一些量化的判定标准?能否一起分享?
作者: mfcnmike    时间: 2008-4-21 17:23
自己理解。只可意会,难以言传……
作者: 爱上验货    时间: 2008-4-21 22:43
会影响卖相就判断严重
做QC的就是要把自己放在消费者中去看产品
作者: zw9940    时间: 2008-4-22 22:45
这个问题没有一个具体的量化标准,只能根据实际情况去判断啊!
作者: ALEXPAN19820529    时间: 2008-4-23 07:08
分安全性 功能性 外观性三原则判断.安全性很重要.
当然还要看是什么产品,客户怎么要求?
作者: tony-77    时间: 2008-4-23 12:22
分缺陷的,尺寸,位置,以及颜色对比,数量,以及有无潜在的破坏;
在主要位置很容易,尺寸大,数量多,以及与主色调有明显色差很容易判MAJOR,还有是看产品的价格,客人的要求等去判断
作者: henry3330    时间: 2008-5-12 14:44
标题: 回复 #1 joanallen 的帖子
5.        Products should be free damage during visual examination. Damage present on the front or top of an item (highly visible) should be considered major defects.
6.        Products should be free from scrapes, scratches or dents. Scrapes, scratches or dents present on the top or front of an item (highly visible), 1 inch (2.54cm) or greater in length/diameter should be considered major defects.
7.        Products should be free from scrapes, scratches or dents. Scrapes, scratches or dents present on the back, sides or bottom of an item (highly visible) or less than 1 inch (2.54cm) in length/diameter should be considered minor defects.
8.        Products should be free damage during visual examination. Damage present on the back, sides or bottom of an item (not highly visible) should be considered minor defects.
作者: zouhymax    时间: 2008-5-15 11:28
5.        Products should be free damage during visual examination. Damage present on the front or top of an item (highly visible) should be considered major defects.
6.        Products should be free from scrapes, scratches or dents. Scrapes, scratches or dents present on the top or front of an item (highly visible), 1 inch (2.54cm) or greater in length/diameter should be considered major defects.
7.        Products should be free from scrapes, scratches or dents. Scrapes, scratches or dents present on the back, sides or bottom of an item (highly visible) or less than 1 inch (2.54cm) in length/diameter should be considered minor defects.
8.        Products should be free damage during visual examination. Damage present on the back, sides or bottom of an item (not highly visible) should be considered minor defects.
作者: johney007    时间: 2008-5-20 16:37
请资深人世来解答~

学习~~
作者: lucas1999    时间: 2008-5-20 21:21
远点看,如果看不见,为MIRROR,如果看的见为MAJOR
作者: Wendy-mili    时间: 2008-11-15 17:23
标题: 回复 10# lucas1999 的帖子
最简单的说法啊
作者: zyq020115    时间: 2008-11-15 18:45
你为消费者,感觉有这defect在,没什么关系,比如说一些无关紧要的毛刺啊,一点脏污啊,那就是minor, 你如果认为这个划痕这么大,这东西的品质可定很烂,要买别的产品的,这就是major. 如果涉及卫生安全的,轻点的就搞个minor,重的可以判为critical
作者: siwa999    时间: 2008-11-16 06:59
凭经验判断了,还要看整体比例如何......
作者: admqckent    时间: 2008-11-18 15:38
要根据具体产品类别及客人要求而定,也不能是一概而论的。对于不同的产品是无法用一个量化的标准来规定的。
作者: js031417    时间: 2008-11-19 09:57
请资深人世来解答~

学习~~




欢迎光临 验货员论坛 (http://bbs.wtoqc.net/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2